[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Invited Commentary
April 8, 2013

Less Patient-Centered Care: An Unintended Consequence of Guidelines? Comment on “Patient Perceptions, Physician Communication, and the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator”

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Division of General Internal Medicine and Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California (Dr Lin); and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver (Dr Matlock).

JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):578-579. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.4187

Sudden cardiac death is a leading cause of death in the United States and worldwide. The first successful insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in the 1980s heralded a new era of treatment for sudden cardiac death. Although ICDs were initially implanted to prevent the death of patients who had survived a potentially lethal arrhythmia, randomized controlled trials have also demonstrated the efficacy of ICDs for patients at high risk of having a sudden cardiac death.1 Consequently, ICDs have become a guideline-recommended mainstay of treatment for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

×