Author Affiliations: Duke Translational Medicine Institute and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center (Dr Califf), and Duke Clinical Research Institute (Mr McCall), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (Dr Harrington).
Clinical research should contribute to a generalizable body of evidence that can guide decisions about clinical practice, personal health, and health policies. Recently, however, the integrity of the results disseminated in the biomedical literature has been questioned. Critics point to selective omission of important findings from articles1 and fundamental inaccuracies in those that are published.2 Particular scrutiny has been applied to financial conflicts of interest associated with industry-funded research. Such concerns are legitimate; however, a narrow focus on funding sources may not illuminate the most relevant issues. For all research, the cardinal principle should be “trust but verify.”
Califf RM, McCall J, Harrington RA. Assessing Research Results in the Medical Literature: Trust but Verify. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(12):1053–1055. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.829
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: