[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.206.12.79. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Commentary
January 2014

Patterns of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use: An Opportunity for Data-Driven Resource Allocation

Author Affiliations
  • 1Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • 2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(1):122-124. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10502

Both the American Cancer Society1 and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network2 have published guidelines on the recommended use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In both sets of guidelines, lifetime breast cancer risk greater than 20% has been established as an acceptable threshold for annual MRI screening when used together with annual mammography screening. Routine breast MRI screening is not recommended for a new cancer diagnosis or for cancer surveillance.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    Benefits of screening for breast cancer with MRI
    David L. Keller, M.D. | Disabled internist
    1) The high prices charged by hospitals for MRI exams are not intrinsically necessary. The regular cash price for a non-contrast 3 Tesla brain MRI, including all physician and facility charges, is $350 at a local for-profit imaging center (1). The local non-profit hospitals charge far more for the same examination. 2) Younger women have a higher content of glandular breast tissue, which is sensitive to the ionizing radiation exposure with mammography. They also have more expected years of lifespan during which to develop radiation-induced breast malignancies. 3) Many women are not compliant with screening mammography due to the pain caused by the compression of the breast glandular tissues. Again, younger women are more affected by this pain, and have more quality-adjusted life years to lose by not screening. Breast MRI is not painful.4) The increased sensitivity of breast MRI, even at the expense of reduced specificity, is compatible with the purpose of a screening exam. When screening for cancer, a false-positive can be addressed with further testing, but the harm caused by a false-negative often cannot be mitigated. The harms caused by a false-positive cancer screening test can be controlled if the informed patient chooses watchful waiting rather than an immediate invasive biopsy.Women who refuse screening mammography due to pain or the wish to avoid ionizing radiation to their breasts should be informed of these issues and offered screening with MRI.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    ×