[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
June 2014

The Argument Against Reimbursing Physicians for Value

Author Affiliations
  • 1Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Christus St Vincent Regional Medical Center, Santa Fe, New Mexico

Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(6):845-846. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1063

Since the time of Hippocrates, it has been assumed that a physician’s first obligation is to provide the best possible care to individual patients, without distortion by competing societal interests.1 This once near-sacrosanct principle is being tested by the high costs of the health care in the United States, which increasingly threaten the economy. Because physicians control much of the delivery of health care, they have a natural role in helping to control health care costs. But historically, our society has been uneasy about assigning this role to physicians. When people are sick and helpless, do they really want their physicians to be influenced by costs, or do they need to believe that their physicians want only to serve them according to their medical needs?