In Reply We thank Dr Keller for drawing attention to several additional points regarding the use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for breast cancer screening. With respect to the first comment, we concur that the attributes of a screening test include that it must be both noninvasive and inexpensive. While the $350 reported charges for an MRI by a for-profit screening center is not exorbitant, it still remains much higher than the cost of a routine screening mammogram, is a significant out-of-pocket cost for most patients, and begs the question of whether patients should cover the cost of their own cancer screening, given that MRI has not been shown to offer benefit over mammography for the general population.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Hwang ES. In Defense of Screening for Breast Cancer With Magnetic Resonance Imaging—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(8):1417–1418. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.803
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: