[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Editor's Correspondence
June 24, 2002

Research and Religion

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(12):1421. doi:

Chibnall and colleagues1 are to be congratulated for many points made and supported in their recent commentary concerning research on distant intercessory prayer. The lack of a comprehensive model, the explanatory relevance concerns, and the testability issues are all notable. However, I am concerned about their comments and implications in 2 areas, (1) syncretism and (2) encouragement of future research.

Add or change institution