[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Invited Commentary
August 2015

Time to Test Incentives to Increase Organ Donation

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • 2Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1329-1330. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2200

In 1987, when the United Network for Organ Sharing began keeping records, there was a gap between supply of organs and demand. With time, that gap has become a chasm. Last year, more than 120 000 people were in need of a kidney, liver, heart, or lung; roughly 7000 of them died while waiting.1

During the past 2 decades, states have tried several ways to encourage nondirected organ donation from deceased and living donors. These methods have included, for example, a state tax deduction for expenses incurred by living donors. But do such policies wield a meaningful effect? In this issue, Chatterjee and colleagues,2 to our knowledge, conduct the first examination of the national effect of a variety of policies on organ donation, and find that the policies barely made a dent.

×