Since all drugs have adverse effects, the decision to prescribe always involves a weighing of benefits and risks. In the case of opioids prescribed for chronic pain (excluding life-threatening conditions such as cancer), we have no evidence of benefit with long-term use and much evidence of harm. However, “no evidence of benefit” is not the same as “evidence of no benefit,” especially when the patient in front of you has chronic pain and has tried nonopioid medications (eg, acetaminophen, ibuprofen) without relief or has been taking a stable dose of opioids for months or years and is asking you for a prescription.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Katz MH. Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Pain: Not for the Faint of Heart. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):599–601. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0664
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.