[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 859
Citations 0
Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography
June 2016

Deep T-Wave Inversions After Pacemaker Adjustment

Author Affiliations
  • 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Shapiro Cardiovascular Center, Boston, Massachusetts
 

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(6):839-840. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1121

A man in his 80s presented for his 1-month follow-up after bioprosthetic aortic valve placement for severe aortic stenosis. At presentation, he was feeling well and denied chest pain or dyspnea, and an electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained (Figure 1). He had a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, first degree atrioventricular block, and sick sinus syndrome for which a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) had been placed a year prior. The lower rate limit of this device had been increased from 60 beats per minute (bpm) to 80 bpm in the perioperative setting of the recent valve placement procedure. Two weeks later, evaluation of his device revealed underlying atrial fibrillation with 97% ventricular pacing. The lower rate limit was decreased back to 60 bpm at that visit.

×