[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 93
Citations 0
Comment & Response
December 2017

Considerations Concerning Disease Redefinition

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Epidemiology, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 2Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(12):1872-1873. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6139

To the Editor In a Special Communication published in a recent issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Doust et al1 raised timely concerns about modifying disease definitions, which, in essence, addresses what constitutes a disease and is a fundamental question for modern medicine where diseases are often diagnosed without symptoms and signs. However, the checklist proposed mixed the criteria for modifying a disease definition (items 6 through 8 in Table 2) with the reasons (item 3) and consequences (items 1, 2, and 4) of making the change. For defining a disease, the risk of the condition and the benefits and harms of interventions should be set as primary determinants.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview