In Reply We thank Dr Otulana for his interest and response to our Research Letter.1 We agree that repository corticotropin (Acthar) may have a place in therapy for a small number of patients who cannot tolerate or do not respond to synthetic corticosteroids. While Acthar use in the Medicare program is attributable to a relatively small number of specialists, costs to the program are substantial. In 2015, Medicare spent nearly twice as much approximately $504 million) on Acthar for 3104 patients than it did on lisinopril prescriptions (approximately $253 million) for 7.8 million patients.2
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Hartung DM, Bourdette DN, Cohen DM. Uses of H.P. Acthar Gel in the Clinical Setting—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(4):583–584. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8545
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: