In Reply We thank Wong and Shojania and Kamal and Agrawal for their interest and commentary on our recent Editorial.1 Wong and Shojania appropriately discuss the value of interrupted time series as a method to study quality improvement. A time series is a sequence of repeated measurements of an outcome over time. An interrupted time series is a sequence of repeated measurements taken both before and after the time series is “interrupted” by an intervention at a specific point in time. In theory, if the intervention is effective, the expected slope of the outcome measure based on measurements before the intervention should change significantly at the time of the intervention.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
O’Malley PG, Redberg RF, Grady D. Rigor in Quality Improvement Studies and the Role of Time-Series Methodologies—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(5):725–726. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0872
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: