To the Editor We read with great interest the Research Letter by Lee et al1 published in a recent issue of JAMA Internal Medicine. The authors note that the assistance of a qualified chaplain to conduct advance care planning is a feasible way to address and complete advance directives.
Of interest is that these conversations were initiated in the physician’s office. Various studies2-4 have noted that the setting in which this important discussion occurs may affect the outcome. For example, Bern-Klug and Byram2 noted that a higher percentage of individuals had discussed their end-of-life wishes with a lawyer in comparison to a physician. This interesting finding may be owing to a number of factors including the association of advance directives and living wills with legal documents. However, it may also be that a lawyer’s office feels more private instead of a physician’s office, which may have many patients in the waiting room.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Chang EY, Umar A. Further Considerations Concerning Advance Care Planning in Medical Practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(6):867. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1772
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: