[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 199
Citations 0
Comment & Response
August 2018

Revised Meta-analysis of Vitamin K and Fractures

Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 2University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(8):1135. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2853

To the Editor Torgerson and colleagues are to be congratulated in addressing the effect on their meta-analysis of trials of vitamin K and fractures following the recognition that 3 of 7 contributing trials are problematic.1 However, we are concerned that the conclusions of the updated article are no longer consistent with the results of the updated analysis presented in their Figure 4.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words