[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Commentary
December 2018

Use of Renin Angiotensin System Blockers After Acute Kidney Injury: Balancing Tradeoffs

Author Affiliations
  • 1Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1690-1692. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4757

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication among acutely ill hospitalized patients. Depending on the definition used, AKI complicates 1% to 25% of intensive care unit admissions and is associated with mortality rates of 15% to 60%.1 Through a variety of mechanisms that affect the kidneys and the vasculature, patients with AKI are at increased risk for the subsequent development of not only chronic kidney disease but also hypertension, stroke, and cardiovascular disease.2 Because of the known nephroprotective and cardioprotective effects of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs] and angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]),3,4 it has been postulated that these agents should be used after AKI to mitigate the risk of adverse cardiorenal outcomes in patients with AKI. Testing this hypothesis, Gayat et al5 recently reported that among 1551 intensive care unit patients enrolled in a prospective cohort, 611 of whom had AKI, those who were prescribed an RAS blocker at the time of hospital discharge had 52% lower mortality (propensity score–matched hazard ratio [HR], 0.48) than those not prescribed an RAS blocker. Of interest, in difference from those with AKI, this association was not noted in patients without AKI during the hospitalization (HR, 1.0).5

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words