Medical overuse, or health services for which potential harms outweigh benefits, is common and persistent. Medical overuse is assumed to exist when regional variation occurs without improvements in outcomes and is believed to be driven largely by perverse financial incentives and local cultures of care.1 In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Schwartz and colleagues2 quantified variations in primary care physician provision of low-value services (largely representing overuse) among Medicare beneficiaries and characterized associations with physician characteristics such as age, training, and research activities. Although practice varied widely within organizations, little variation was due to observable physician characteristics. These findings suggest that overuse drivers go beyond incentives and culture and that reducing overuse will require deeper understanding of physician behavior.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Korenstein D. Medical Overuse as a Physician Cognitive Error: Looking Under the Hood. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(1):26–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5136
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: