To the Editor We commend Stelfox and colleagues1 for their excellent work in evaluating the practice of directly discharging patients home from critical care. The authors clearly identified local practice and service structure as factors in ensuring safety in this less-than-ideal practice.
In this context, we would like to present results from the UK National Health Service, which provides a different perspective on the work of the authors. The UK National Health Service is in the middle of significant bed pressures, a problem exacerbated by fewer hospital and critical care bed availability when compared with the rest of the developed world.2
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Roshdy A, Radhakrishnan J, Kiff K. Discharge Home From Critical Care: Comparing Different Health Care Systems. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1729. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6533
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: