In Reply We appreciate the comments by Munk and Barker regarding about antibiotic stewardship. The rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for respiratory conditions in the study by Palms and colleagues1 likely reflects the fact that some patients may not have sought care at all if not for the easy, same-day access afforded by both retail and urgent care clinics. As the authors of the study note, 17% of visits to retail clinics (53.7% of visits if conditions such as sinusitis and pharyngitis, for which antibiotics are rarely necessary in adults, are included) were for antibiotic inappropriate respiratory conditions—outpacing urgent care centers and higher than the rates of 5% and 6% in emergency department and traditional office visits, respectively.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Redberg RF, Incze M, Katz MH. Retail Clinics Provide Important Antibiotic Stewardship—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(1):124. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7013
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: