[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 861
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
April 1, 2019

EMTALA—A Noble Policy That Needs Improvement

Author Affiliations
  • 1NYC Health and Hospitals, New York, New York
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(5):693-694. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0026

The US Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) in 1986, which requires all US hospitals that accept Medicare to provide emergency department (ED) care to all patients regardless of their ability to pay.1 It is nobly intended and has ensured emergency care at for-profit, nonprofit, and public hospitals. The EMTALA requires that if a hospital has the capability, it must stabilize the patient prior to transfer to another facility, unless the patient requests an immediate transfer.2 There is no doubt that EMTALA has led to substantial improvement in disparities in access to emergency care. However, the flaws that have appeared over the past 3 decades highlight the need for additional improvements to ensure the goal of access to health care for all.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×