To the Editor In a recent Editor’s Note,1 Dr Redberg responded to an analysis of test-ordering habits among internal medicine residents2 with the laudable comment: “Residency is the perfect time to think clearly and deeply what can be learned from each potential test and to order only those tests that will affect the care of the patient.”1(p1721) However, she does not describe that learning process. I propose, in this era of evidence-based medicine, empiricism (in the modern sense) based on inductive logic, is the primary methodology to do so. Data gathered from experience and experiment allow the formation of theories and guide future activities.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Horowitz SH. Analyze Patient Tests for Importance Before Ordering. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(5):729. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8333
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: