In Reply We commend Godefroy and colleagues for making the case for providing scheduled dialysis for undocumented immigrants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Europe, an issue likely to be exacerbated by recent migrant and refugee crises. Herein, we address their concerns with our article1 regarding the lack of competing risks in the survival analysis, incomplete accounting for outpatient care and costs, and longer emergency-only dialysis vintage at baseline among the scheduled dialysis group.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Nguyen OK, Makam AN. Comparison of Scheduled vs Emergency-Only Dialysis in Undocumented Immigrants With End-stage Renal Disease—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(5):728–729. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0537
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: