When patients are too ill to make their own health care decisions and lack a previously designated decision maker, identifying the appropriate surrogate can be a complex process. For example, clinicians may use surrogacy ladders (hierarchical lists of individuals who could serve as decision makers), which are delineated in state statutes.1 Although patients with incapacitating illness are inherently vulnerable, there are additional considerations for people who are incarcerated, and these may not be addressed in state laws. We discuss the selection of surrogates for incarcerated patients and who should or should not serve in this role.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Scarlet S, DeMartino ES, Siegler M. Surrogate Decision Making for Incarcerated Patients. JAMA Intern Med. Published online May 20, 2019179(7):861–862. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1386
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: