To the Editor I read with interest the recently published Original Investigation by Roerecke and colleagues.1 The accurate assessment of blood pressure (BP) is an important step in determining cardiovascular risk; therefore, efforts to improve the accuracy of measurement should be encouraged. The article, while adding to the evidence in favor of using automated office BP (AOBP) measurement, had several limitations that I would like to highlight so that they can be addressed in future research.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Etyang AO. Methodological Issues in Determining the Accuracy of Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings for Diagnosing Hypertension. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):850. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1224
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: