[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Comment & Response
June 2019

Complication Rates in a Study of Invasive Diagnostic Procedures for Lung Abnormalities—In Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
  • 2Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):847. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0954

In Reply We appreciate the comments by Halliday et al regarding our article.1 Concerns of overestimated complication rates were raised, citing the following 4 reasons: representativeness of our study population, unmeasured confounders, relevant time frame for postprocedural complications, and not differentiating between complications with vs without direct association with the invasive diagnostic procedures. Herein, we have summarized our point-by-point response.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×