[Skip to Navigation]
Comment & Response
July 2019

Evidence-Based Medicine and the American Thoracic Society Guidelines

Author Affiliations
  • 1Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 2Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
  • 3Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):1003-1004. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1867

To the Editor Given our roles in the development of American Thoracic Society (ATS) clinical practice guidelines, we have concerns about the recently published Research Letter by Schumacher and colleagues.1

The study did not include 17 guidelines published since 2011 (Table), or more if earlier guidelines are also considered. Of the recommendations analyzed, 50% were from guidelines whose development predated publication of the Institute of Medicine’s 2011 standards for trustworthy guidelines2 and/or the ATS’s implementation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words