[Skip to Navigation]
Comment & Response
July 2019

Correcting Meta-analyses and Reviews Affected by Retracted Research

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 2Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):1005. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1875

To the Editor In their recently published Research Letter, Garmendia and colleagues1 highlight the adverse effects of the inclusion of publications with falsified data on meta-analyses. Because meta-analyses and clinical reviews influence clinical practice and future research, a critical question is how this literature should be corrected when it includes unreliable data.

Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words