In Reply I thank Garibaldi and Russell for their thoughtful communication and contributions to the fields of diagnosis, bedside medicine, and medical education. Indeed, the patient in my Perspective1 offers many additional lessons to those originally shared. The value of hypothesis-driven physical examination is one and is conveyed memorably in their letter. I also agree with their other assertions and recommendations. As such, I would like only to reflect further on 2 topics from this conversation.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Sargsyan Z. Strategies to Avoid the “Hemolyzed” Physical Examination—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):1000–1001. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1726
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: