In Reply Grey and colleagues provide additional information on the current issue with data integrity, including data falsification.1 Their data and conclusions were in line with our study and strengthen the argument further that the current system of self-reporting errors is neither appropriate nor adequate. We agree with their call for guidance on the notification and correction of all literature, including meta-analyses, and its implementation.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Garmendia CA, Madhivanan P. Correcting Meta-analyses and Reviews Affected by Retracted Research—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):1006. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1870
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: