[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 118
Citations 0
Comment & Response
July 2019

Correcting Meta-analyses and Reviews Affected by Retracted Research—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1US Food and Drug Administration, Miami, Florida
  • 2Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • 3Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):1006. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1870

In Reply Grey and colleagues provide additional information on the current issue with data integrity, including data falsification.1 Their data and conclusions were in line with our study and strengthen the argument further that the current system of self-reporting errors is neither appropriate nor adequate. We agree with their call for guidance on the notification and correction of all literature, including meta-analyses, and its implementation.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×