[Skip to Navigation]
Invited Commentary
July 8, 2019

Expanding Access to Short-Acting Hormonal Contraceptive Methods in the United States

Author Affiliations
  • 1Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(9):1209-1210. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1676
Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Personal Responsibility in danger of extinction
    Gerry Silverstein, PhD | University-Emeritus Lecturer in Microbiology & Molecular Genetics
    "45% of all pregnancies are reported to be unwanted or mistimed,suggesting that people’s contraceptive needs are not being fully met."

    According to the terms of the ACA, 18 different types of contraception have been made available absolutely free with no co-pays and no deductibles (condoms are not provided free even though they not only prevent unwanted pregnancies---if used correctly--- they also prevent spread of STDs).

    Included in the 18 are 8 different contraception methods that have a 99% or greater efficacy in preventing unwanted pregnancies (when used correctly).

    So are people's contraceptive needs "not
    being met", or are people not accepting the personal responsibility for using (correctly) what is readily available and free?

    There is no more sacred an act that 2 human beings can engage in then the creation of a human being, yet as in so many aspects of daily living in this country (physical inactivity, excess caloric and alcohol intake, etc), individuals are failing to take the necessary steps to prevent an unwanted pregnancy when the creation of a new human being is not desired.

    We have become a society in which individual failings are always someone else's fault or the fault of society at large. I submit that such a society has a limited lifespan.