[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 440
Citations 0
Research Letter
September 3, 2019

Association Between Data Sources and US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communications

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
  • 2Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 3Statistics Consulting Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel
  • 4Medicine A, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
  • 5Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • 6Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
JAMA Intern Med. Published online September 3, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3066

Drug safety communications (DSCs) are the primary tool for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to communicate important new postmarketing safety information to patients and health care professionals.1 Drug safety communications are issued by the FDA for more than one-quarter of new drug and biologic approvals.2 There are known inconsistencies in issuing DSCs across national regulators.3 Less is known about the information source that typically serves as the basis of the initial safety signals that lead to DSCs, such as spontaneous reports aggregated through the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS),4 results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), or observational studies. Our objective was to describe the sources of the initial safety signals that lead to DSCs and examine their associations with drug characteristics and subsequent label changes.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words