[Skip to Navigation]
Views 123
Citations 0
Comment & Response
November 2019

Reevaluating the Use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to Identify Incident Cases of Atrial Fibrillation After Aortic Valve Replacement—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • 2Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • 3Section of Cardiology, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(11):1598. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4412

In Reply We thank Malik et al for their interest in our article1 and their comments. We agree with the authors regarding the difficulty of differentiating between incident and prevalent atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. We noted this in the article’s Limitations section.1 Furthermore, we also stated in our Methods section1 that the reported rates of AF from the NIS assumed that all secondary discharge field disease coding was for new diagnoses of AF. We realized this assumption or approach may not be completely accurate, but it has been previously published using the NIS database.2,3 We were cognizant of the limitations with the NIS database that Malik et al highlighted, so we attempted to combat them using the additional analyses involving a validation cohort from the New York state inpatient database. This database has a unique patient identifier, and prior data have confirmed correct estimates of incident AF.4

Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words