In Reply Du et al raise 3 issues with our study.1 First, in one analysis, we use methods described by Linden2 and Davis3 to estimate the extent to which regression to the mean (RTM) explains changes in excess readmissions after implementation of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP). As noted by Du et al, this analysis assumes that excess readmission ratios (ERRs) follow a gaussian distribution, but this assumption is violated for 2 of 3 conditions analyzed. Second, they question our choice to analyze RTM in ERRs rather than risk-adjusted readmissions. Finally, they question whether our estimates establish that RTM causally led to a decline in excess readmissions. Below, we respond to each of these concerns.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Joshi S, Nuckols T, Sood N. More Considerations on Both Model Assumptions and Results Interpretations—Evaluating Readmission—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(11):1599–1600. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4721
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: