In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Qin and colleagues1 report that more than half of bimanual pelvic examinations and about 70% of Papanicolaou (Pap) tests performed among girls and women aged 15 to 20 years in the United States are potentially unnecessary. The findings of their cross-sectional study demonstrate what happens to vulnerable populations (in this case, girls and young women) when clinicians do not keep up with or do not adhere to new guidelines.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Simon MA. Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Testing in Adolescents and Young Women—Learning How to Unlearn. JAMA Intern Med. Published online January 06, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6291
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: