To the Editor We identify several flaws in the approach used by Chen and colleagues1 to analyze Medicare’s graduate medical education (GME) payment policies that led to the unfounded claim of Medicare GME overpayment. The authors questioned the soundness of Medicare GME payments being set “without assessing the association with teaching costs,”1 but the entire study ignores the cost side of the payment equation by applying the $150 000 Teaching Health Center program payment rate cap to estimate Medicare overpayment for GME and assumes that teaching hospitals can support lower payment no matter their training costs. This approach is not sensible because real-world GME programs are subject to many variations, such as additional costs for surgical training programs compared with training primary care physicians at teaching health centers.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Xu S, Orlowski JM. Considerations in Analysis of Medicare Graduate Medical Education Payment Policies. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(3):471. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6966
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: