To the Editor In their recently published Original Investigation, Schonberg et al1 correctly reported that “guidelines recommend not screening women 75 years and older at low or average risk regardless of their life expectancy”1(p837) and that “a threshold of at least a 3% 5-year risk has been recommended to define high risk; however, increasingly higher thresholds are used, such as at least a 6% 5-year risk. Only 3 women in our study had a 5-year risk of at least 6%.”1(p839) Therefore, almost all of these women (mean age, 78-79 years) could reasonably have stopped the screening.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Donzelli A, Giudicatti G. Decision Aids and the Absence of Expected Longevity Benefits of Mammography Screening in Women 75 Years and Older. JAMA Intern Med. Published online September 14, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3620
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: