In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Drawz et al1 report data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) comparing office blood pressure (BP) measured in the trial with office BP obtained during routine clinical practice. SPRINT, which enrolled adults 50 years or older without diabetes or stroke to determine whether a more intensive BP treatment target was beneficial, was stopped early after an interim analysis showed that an office systolic BP (SBP) target of less than 120 mm Hg reduced cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared with a standard SBP target of less than 140 mm Hg.2 As in many hypertension trials, office BP was measured using a standardized protocol that included use of an oscillometric device and appropriately sized cuff along with a 5-minute period of rest before BP was measured, proper positioning of the participant, and measurement of and calculating the mean of 3 BP readings.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Dodson JA, Shimbo D. A Tale of 2 Blood Pressures. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(12):1663–1664. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5007
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: