To the Editor In their Invited Commentary, Rosekind et al1 wisely called for more data to guide action on our drugged driving problems. The authors recommended more crash risk studies such as the ones that were so instrumental in dealing with drunk driving. Unfortunately, such studies are no longer easily conducted to determine the effects of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or any other drug, on driving risk. When drunk driving studies were done, the persons were either drunk or unimpaired. Drugged driving was very rare in those days. This made attribution of causes of crashes fairly unambiguous. Making causal attribution is problematic in today’s world of poly drug-impaired drivers.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Wood EC. Marijuana Is Not the Only Cause of Drugged Driving. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(2):293. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6272
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.