“A 54-year-old woman presents with a hip fracture after a fall from standing.”
“A 70-year-old woman presents with a fracture of the radius after a fall from a 6-foot ladder.”
“A 64-year-old woman presents with fractures of her pelvis and tibia after a high-speed motor vehicle collision.”
In approaching a patient who has fractured a bone, clinicians are trained to detail the circumstances of the fracture. Was it the result of a ground-level fall or a higher level of trauma? We do this because we believe that the fracture sustained after minimal or no trauma constitutes a fragility fracture and that fragility fractures are the only ones that warrant evaluation and interventions to prevent future fracture. Clinical practice guidelines reinforce this behavior.1
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Schafer AL, Shoback DM. A Distinction Without a Difference—Does It Matter Whether Fractures Are Nontraumatic or Traumatic? JAMA Intern Med. Published online June 07, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2599
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: