In Reply We appreciate the insightful comments by Gallen et al in response to our article.1 We would like to thank JAMA Internal Medicine for the opportunity to respond to them.
In their letter, Gallen et al comment on the possibility that transcutaneous pacing (TCP) could temporize the decompensated hemodynamics due to significant bradyarrhythmia. Traditionally, the efficacy of TCP for bradyarrhythmic cardiac arrest was thought to be equally limited in both prehospital and inpatient settings.2 In the scenario of prehospital cardiac arrest, which is usually not witnessed, chest compression has been shown to be the most important aspect of resuscitation, and TCP could potentially divert the focus from the effectiveness of chest compression. Therefore, the conventional adult basic and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guideline does not recommend TCP for patients with bradyarrhythmic cardiac arrest that occurs before hospital admission.3
Tsushima T, Patel TR, Sahadevan J. Advanced Cardiac Life Support Algorithms—Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(8):1141–1142. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3174
Artificial Intelligence Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.