[Skip to Navigation]
Views 424
Citations 0
Comment & Response
July 12, 2021

The Coverage in England of US-Approved Cancer Drugs

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacy, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • 2Department of Breast Surgery, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
  • 3Navitas Clinic Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(9):1263. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3336

To the Editor Cherla and colleagues1 use the case of cancer drugs that received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1992 to 2017 to compare the regulatory processes of the FDA, the UK National Health Service (NHS), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). We have 2 critiques of their results.

First, the authors did not consider how the regulatory environments in both the US and Europe have changed over time. During the study period between 1992 and 2017, the EMA and the FDA sought to work collaboratively in line with the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.2 Specifically, the EMA and the FDA signed an agreement to share confidential information in 2003, and they have been holding teleconferences called cluster activities several times each year to share information on cancer drug reviews and marketing authorization applications. As a result, the percentage of drugs approved by both the EMA and the FDA has increased from 60% in 2006 through 2008 to 90% in 2016.2 Still, there are differences between the EMA and the FDA in terms of the basis upon which they approved the drugs. For example, the EMA has increasingly used health-related quality of life as an alternative outcome to survival rate.3 Although the authors noted the weaknesses of accelerated approval using surrogate end points, the decision of the EMA to consider such end points is the result of ongoing efforts both to achieve international harmonization and to supplement insufficient data.

Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words