[Skip to Navigation]
Original Investigation
September 18, 2023

Comparison of Hospital Online Price and Telephone Price for Shoppable Services

Author Affiliations
  • 1The University of Texas Medical Branch John Sealy School of Medicine, Galveston
  • 2Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public and Population Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
  • 3The Hilltop Institute, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore
  • 4Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 5Baker Institute, Rice University, Houston, Texas
  • 6Mark Cuban Companies, Dallas, Texas
  • 7Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch John Sealy School of Medicine, Galveston
  • 8Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(11):1214-1220. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4753
Key Points

Question  How well do US hospitals’ online prices posted for shoppable services correlate with their prices for the same service obtained via the telephone?

Findings  In this cross-sectional study of 60 US hospitals, online and phone cash prices were poorly correlated within a given hospital for vaginal childbirth (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] = 0.118) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (Pearson r = −0.169).

Meaning  These findings suggest that at US hospitals, price estimates for shoppable services posted online correlate poorly with prices obtained via phone; these findings suggest that patients will continue to face barriers to comparison shopping.

Abstract

Importance  US hospitals are required to publicly post their prices for specified shoppable services online. However, the extent to which a hospital’s prices posted online correlate with the prices they give to a telephone caller is unknown.

Objective  To compare hospitals’ online cash prices for vaginal childbirth and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with prices offered to secret shopper callers requesting price estimates by telephone.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cross-sectional study included cash online prices from each hospital’s website for vaginal childbirth and brain MRI collected from representative US hospitals between August and October 2022. Thereafter, again between August and October 2022, simulated secret shopper patients called each hospital requesting their lowest cash price for these procedures.

Main Outcomes and Measures  We calculated the difference between each hospital’s online and phone prices for vaginal childbirth and brain MRI, and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the online and phone prices for each procedure, among hospitals able to provide both prices,

Results  A total of 60 representative US hospitals (20 top-ranked, 20 safety-net, and 20 non–top-ranked, non–safety-net hospitals) were included in the analysis. For vaginal childbirth, 63% (12 of 19) of top-ranked hospitals, 30% (6 of 20) of safety-net hospitals, and 21% (4 of 19) of non–top-ranked, non–safety-net hospitals provided both online and telephone prices. For brain MRI, 85% (17 of 20) of top-ranked hospitals, 50% (10 of 20) of safety-net hospitals, and 100% (20 of 20) of non–top-ranked, non–safety-net hospitals provided prices both online and via telephone. Online prices and telephone prices for both procedures varied widely. For example, online prices for vaginal childbirth posted by top-ranked hospitals ranged from $0 to $55 221 (mean, $23 040), from $4361 to $14 377 (mean $10 925) for safety-net hospitals, and from $1183 to $30 299 (mean $15 861) for non–top-ranked, non–safety-net hospitals. Among the 22 hospitals providing prices both online and by telephone for vaginal childbirth, prices were within 25% of each other for 45% (10) of hospitals, while 41% (9) of hospitals had differences of 50% or more (Pearson r = 0.118). Among the 47 hospitals providing both online and phone prices for brain MRI, prices were within 25% of each other for 66% (31) of hospitals), while 26% (n = 12) had differences of 50% or more (Pearson r = −0.169). Among hospitals that provided prices both online and via telephone, there was a complete match between the online and telephone prices for vaginal childbirth in 14% (3 of 22) of hospitals and for brain MRI in 19% (9 of 47) of hospitals.

Conclusions and Relevance  Findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that there was poor correlation between hospitals’ self-posted online prices and prices they offered by telephone to secret shoppers. These results demonstrate hospitals’ continued problems in knowing and communicating their prices for specific services. The findings also highlight the continued challenges for uninsured patients and others who attempt to comparison shop for health care.

Add or change institution
1 Comment for this article
Price transparency is cloudy at best
Kristin Baird, BSN, MHA | This is not unusual. Our research shows that the people answering the phones haven't been trained, and most organizations are not prepared for transparency.
The No Surprises Act (NSA) is great in theory but has yet to play out in reality. Many healthcare organizations have not prepared the front line staff to answer questions about prices. Even those who have dedicated Good Faith Estimate (GFE) phone lines are under-performing when put to the test. The only way to know if your organization is living up to the expectation is to test, test, test.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: My company does medical mystery shopping. I have expertise in this area.
×