[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
April 1924


Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1924;33(4):533-534. doi:10.1001/archinte.1924.00110280131015

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Under an unfamiliar name, we have here a valuable contribution to medical history. Too often writers on medical history have felt it necessary to cover the whole subject from the beginning of the world, with endless notes and innumerable biographies. This tendency probably has had much to do with the neglect of the study of medical history. Knud Faber has traced the growth of nosography, that is the description of disease, in a masterly and attractive manner. As he correctly says, the importance of the nosographic method in investigation has been, and still is, very differently rated by different authorities. For this reason, he has made a study, the salient points of which follow.

On page 5, he takes up the work of the man "who first consciously and clearly gave clinical observation its place of honor as a scientific method"— Thomas Syndenham; and, in the following twelve pages, he

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview