[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.200.74. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1962

Double Blind Control Study of Antihypertensive Agents: II. Further Report on the Comparative Effectiveness of Reserpine, Reserpine and Hydralazine, and Three Ganglion Blocking Agents, Chlorisondamine, Mecamylamine, and Pentolinium Tartrate

Author Affiliations

WASHINGTON, D. C.

Arch Intern Med. 1962;110(2):222-229. doi:10.1001/archinte.1962.03620200082015
Abstract

This report presents the results after one year of follow-up of 759 hypertensive patients who were begun on one of a number of randomized, double blind treatment regimens using various antihypertensive agents. The plan of the study and the methods of procedure have been published previously.1

In brief, only patients whose diastolic blood pressure levels averaged 90 mm. Hg or above from the fourth through the sixth hospital days were included in the study. These patients were divided into categories of "mild, moderate, and severe" on the basis of the scores obtained in 5 panels: basal diastolic pressure, optic fundi, and abnormalities of the cardiac, renal, and central nervous systems.

Treatment for patients in the mild and half of the moderately severe group consisted of 1 of 3 possible regimens as follows: (1) reserpine 0.5 mg. twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 0.25 mg. twice daily thereafter plus

×