[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
January 1969

Good Scientific Writing

Arch Intern Med. 1969;123(1):100. doi:10.1001/archinte.1969.00300110102020

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Anew feature begins in this issue of the Archives. Each month we will reprint scientific articles or portions of articles which seem well written. This material will appear regularly on advertising pages 11, 12, and 14.

My search for these articles began several years ago when participants in American Medical Association-Education and Research Foundation medical writing seminars asked for models to follow in their writing. There exists no convenient source, no collection, of good scientific prose; we hope the new section will help supply this want.

What is good scientific writing? No answer to this question can satisfy all inquirers, for goodness is always a subjective quality. Although part of the goodness of good writing comes from the absence of errors, correctness does not itself guarantee goodness.

The purpose of scientific writing is to convey information, not display literary innovation. There is no place in scientific prose for the stylistic

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview