[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.175.200.4. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1969

To Treat or Not to Treat Acute Granulocytic Leukemia. II

Author Affiliations

New Brunswick, NJ, and Salt Lake City

From the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City.

Arch Intern Med. 1969;123(5):568-570. doi:10.1001/archinte.1969.00300150086012
Abstract

In a recent editorial in this journal 1 Crosby expressed the opinion that there are certain varieties of acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) in which specific antileukemic therapy should not be employed. Specifically, he stated that the following types of patients are "not improved by chemotherapy": those with such morphologic subvarieties of this disease as myelomonocytic, promyelocytic, and acute granulocytic leukemia with megaloblastosis (erythroblastic leukemia); patients with the smouldering type of acute leukemia, and patients over the age of 50. In a previous study,2 we were unable to demonstrate any influence of cell type or age upon the rate of response of AML to mercaptopurine. However, the number of patients treated with mercaptopurine in that series was small (63 patients) and experience with certain of the less common varieties of the disease was limited. We therefore have reviewed patients treated in our clinics since that date in order to enlarge

×