This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.
—I would like to comment on the article entitled "The Limited Utility of Fibrinogen I 125 Leg Scanning" in the February issue of the Archives (139:148-153, 1979).The sine qua non of a deep venous thrombosis according to this investigation is the venogram. Since it assumes that a normal venogram rules out the presence of a clot, any other study that indicates that there is a clot is automatically designated as a falsepositive. Since specificity is a truenegative divided by the sum of a true-negative and a false-positive, specificity is based on a study that may in fact be in error. In the absence of any false-positives, specificity as indicated here would be 100%.Sensitivity is designated as a truepositive divided by the sum of a truepositive and a false-negative, again based on the assumption that a venogram is the standard. In the absence of any false-negatives,
Stockland L. Fibrinogen I 125 Leg Scanning. Arch Intern Med. 1980;140(2):285–286. doi:10.1001/archinte.1980.00330140143052
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: