This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
—The comments by Frieden and Cooper show that they have missed the point of the article. The cost comparison should, indeed, be with ordinary rooms and not with the CCU. The thesis of the article is that there are too many intermediate care beds being used for patients who do not need monitoring and who should be in ordinary hospital beds—not in the CCU. I am not arguing that postmyocardial infarction patients should be denied step-down or intermediate monitoring. If intermediate unit monitoring was limited to postmyocardial infarction patients, the vast proliferation of monitored beds throughout the United States would not have occurred.The arithmetic that I quoted is correct. Most institutions charge a $2 to $3/hr monitoring fee plus an additional nursing charge of $5/hr. This means a minimum of $7/hr. This multiplied by 24 equals $168, which, multiplied by ten would be $1,680 additional fees over
Weinberg SL. The Intermediate Coronary Care Unit-Reply. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(2):388. doi:10.1001/archinte.1983.00350020218047
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: