[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1983

Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Trials: Randomized v Historical Controls

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Sacks and Chalmers) and Biomathematical Sciences (Drs Smith and Sacks), Office of the President and Dean (Dr Chalmers), Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York.

Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(4):753-755. doi:10.1001/archinte.1983.00350040143020
Abstract

• The relative accuracy of randomized control trials (RCTs) and historical control trials (HCTs) in determining effective therapies has not been compared since there is no external verification of efficacy. We reviewed six therapies studied by both methods. Most HCTs concluded therapy was better than control, but few RCTs agreed. We calculated sensitivity and specificity for each type of trial by combining published results with all possible combinations of effectiveness. The sensitivity of HCTs was 0.80 to 1.00 (mean, 0.90) and specificity was 0.0 to 0.27 (mean, 0.11). The sensitivity of RCTs was 0.0 to 0.27 (mean, 0.12) and specificity was 0.67 to 1.00 (mean, 0.88). Defects of RCTs are more easily corrected than those of HCTs. Readers should consider trial design and the probability of errors when deciding how much credence to give to a clinical trial.

(Arch Intern Med 1983;143:753-755)

×