This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.
—The physician's responsibilities vis-à-vis nuclear weaponry are the same as those toward any other public health threat—to prevent the outbreak of disease, to minimize the extent of the epidemic (should it occur), and to treat its victims. I will discuss these three responsibilities.The first step toward preventing the "disease" is to recognize that an "outbreak" (a strategic nuclear exchange or all-out nuclear warfare) can occur. Nuclear warfare is a possibility. Dr Marmor (in the December Archives [1982;142:2262-2263]) and many others, however, have declared this idea "unthinkable." While I trust Marmor means "having extremely horrible effects that are highly unpleasant to contemplate," I fear that some use "unthinkable" to mean "extremely improbable"—which just simple is not true—or worse, "so unpleasant to contemplate that we should simply refuse to do so." Attitudes such as these represent highly maladaptive behavior that will result, along with the repression of other
Reeves GI. Physician's Responsibility. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(6):1282–1285. doi:10.1001/archinte.1983.00350060214045
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: