This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
—I am sorry for your misunderstanding of the emphasis of the article. This patient had a massive pericardial effusion and had some evidence of hemodynamic compromise.The pericardiocentesis was performed to improve her overall cardiovascular status. It was not done to determine the efficacy of doing two-dimensional echocardiography simultaneously with the pericardiocentesis. The point that was apparently misunderstood was that simultaneous two-dimensional echocardiography was performed with a clinically and therapeutically indicated pericardiocentesis to determine the efficacy of using the two-dimensional instrument to visualize the pericardiocentesis needle. We clearly did not mean to imply that the pericardiocentesis was indicated to determine the efficacy of using the two-dimensional technique. Just the opposite is true. Furthermore, the published article does convey, by means of the physical description and the evidence of pulsus paradoxus, that the patient did have hemodynamic compromise.I do appreciate your letter. I must assure you that even
Martin RP. Invasive Cardiac Procedures-Reply. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(9):1830. doi:10.1001/archinte.1983.00350090211046
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: